Wednesday, April 29, 2020

Technology to Improve your Running: Interval Speedwork

Last week I talked about finding your maximum heart rate and how to apply it to your Long-Slow Distance runs:

https://gazelleintraining.blogspot.com/2020/04/technology-to-improve-your-running-long.html

Today, I'm going to touch on interval training.  Interval runs are probably the most important workout to you if you are looking to improve your finish times.  The typical structure of an interval workout is:


  1. Warmup
  2. Several iterations of high/low intensity effort
  3. Cooldown
The main benefit from the higher intensity training is that it improves aerobic capacity to allow a person to exercise for longer periods with higher intensity.

Setting up a device to track your intervals is going to be specific to the device.  Personally, I usually don't pre-program workouts into my watch.  I keep an eye on distances and manually press the lap button.  This works great if you know your routes well, especially if you're running on a track which would be more accurate than your GPS anyways.

Plenty of people do program their watches with their workouts.  I can't list off every single watch, but here are links to a few different options.  If you are struggling to figure out your specific device, feel free to post in the Facebook group.  We can usually figure these things out together.


To help you figure out how fast you should be pushing yourself, find the Indicator Run spreadsheet in the Facebook files section.  You can enter a 5k, 3k, or 1 mile time at the top and it will project estimated race times, training paces, and intervals.

For our speed work last week (4x800m repeats), I entered a recent 5k of mine and got an estimated interval time of 3:25.



Unlike the LSD run last week, can see much more pronounced increases/decreases in my heart rate.  While the LSD run is looking to help you maintain your status quo for a longer period, interval runs are where you intentionally push your body to a more uncomfortable pace that you aren't able to maintain.

"Hard' efforts are highlighted


In the four laps, I hit a Max HR of 168, 172, 174, and 175.  This translates to about 90-95% of my theoretical max which is right in the range of what I'm aiming for.  Pace-wise, I was a little ahead (3:14, 3:13, 3:11, 3:12) compared to the estimated 3:25.  I want to emphasize, here, that faster is not always better.  Pushing yourself harder than you are ready can lead to bad workouts and even injuries.

In this instance, this pace is pretty close to in line with my 5k PR, which is a few years old now, but isn't that far outside of a pace I am ready for.  Since the intervals were consistent, I will chalk that up as a win for me.  If these times were less consistent (10+ second spread) then that might mean I pushed myself too hard (or too easy) early in the workout.  You're really aiming to be as consistent as you can throughout the workout.

Something to also point out is that you need to be able to recover between intervals.  When I first started these workouts, I wasn't easing back enough between intervals, which caused my later efforts in the workout to always fall short.  Now, that doesn't mean you stop completely.  Here, I let my HR drop to around the 130 range between the intervals.

Thursday, April 23, 2020

Technology to Improve your Running: Long - Slow Distance

Runners are using a wide array of technology to track their every step.  In addition to time, portable/wearable technologies are tracking location, heart rate, and plenty of other metrics from your body.  Turning those numbers into actionable feedback is not trivial.  My goal with these articles is to analyze some of my own running to give you some tools so that you can critique your own performances.

My focus today is on the workout most runners (new and old) focus on the most: the long-slow distance (LSD).  The purpose of this run is to build your endurance via a long workout at an easy pace.  This strengthens your cardio and skeletal systems, increases fat burn, and improves your body's energy efficiency (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_slow_distance).

The most helpful metric to establish at the start is your heart-rate training zones.

A few other articles on heart-rate training zones:
https://www.runnersworld.com/beginner/a20812270/should-i-do-heart-rate-training/
https://www.polar.com/blog/heart-rate-monitoring-sweet-spot-exercise-intensity/

To take the basic formula, a 40 year-old runner has a theoretical maximum heart rate (MHR) of 180.  Please note that depending on personal fitness and a variety of other factors, this number can easily vary +/- 12 BPM.  The best way to determine your maximum heart rate is to actually perform a live test.

This article gives a field test you can do to determine your MHR:
https://www.polar.com/blog/calculate-maximum-heart-rate-running/

MHR = 220 - AgeInYears = 180

Zone 1: 90-108 (50-60% MHR)
Zone 2: 108-126 (60-70% MHR)
Zone 3: 126-144 (70-80% MHR)
Zone 4: 144-162 (80-90% MHR)
Zone 5: 162-180 (90-100% MHR)

So, how do you use this information to critique your own training?

For a LSD run, you should be aiming for a heart rate between 65 to 70% of maximum (so starting in Zones 2 and maybe creeping into Zone 3).  These runs are slow and steady, so you should aim for a consistent heart rate/effort.  This is a good time to remember that lots of things will influence your heart rate.  Your fitness, weather, terrain, as well as how hard you are pushing yourself will all impact your heart rate.

Before I started watching my heart rate, it was difficult for me to tell the difference between a run where I was running fast because I was pushing myself too hard vs. actually relaxing into the effort I should have been running at.

This is one of my own LSD runs:
https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/4801139085

Knowing my body, I aim for a average HR of about 150 on LSD runs.  I did a really good job of keeping my heart rate down for the first half of this run.  There are a handful of peaks early on (around 0.5, 1.5, and 2.4 miles) which all correspond to hill climbs.

The back-half of the run is a bit more haggard.  Unfortunately, this didn't surprise me to see afterwards.  I failed to actually map this route before I laced up.  The plan had been to run about 6 miles and I ended up closer to 8.  By the time I was 4 miles in, this was becoming apparent.  This stressed me out, lost form to some degree, and probably pushed myself harder than I should have.


What I did well:

  • Initial pacing.  HR increased over hills, which was expected, but I let it come back down.
  • Pace felt manageable (if a bit too fast)

What can I do better:
  • Verify my routes in advance.  
    • To mitigate that problem, I could have stopped running early.  As it was, I ended up pushing myself harder to be home in the time frame I had given my family.
  • Relax.  I tightened up and ran faster in the back half.
  • Overall, I pushed too hard this run.  I shouldn't have that much Zone 4 running.

Something to remember is that every workout has a purpose (otherwise, why bother doing it?).